Choosing a handgun is a deeply personal decision, influenced by factors like intended use, hand size, budget, and personal preference. Two incredibly popular choices in the 9mm market consistently top the lists of consideration: the Glock 19 and the Smith & Wesson M&P 2.0. This in-depth comparison will explore the key features, differences, and performance aspects of both pistols to help you make an informed choice. We'll cover everything from ergonomics and accuracy to reliability and cost.
Key Features and Differences: Glock 19 vs. Smith & Wesson M&P 2.0
Both the Glock 19 and the Smith & Wesson M&P 2.0 are striker-fired, polymer-framed pistols chambered in 9mm, making them popular choices for concealed carry and home defense. However, several key distinctions set them apart.
Ergonomics and Grip
-
Glock 19: The Glock 19's grip is known for its aggressive texturing, providing excellent grip even in wet or sweaty conditions. However, some users find the grip angle slightly more aggressive than other pistols, making it less comfortable for extended shooting sessions. The Glock's simple, straight-back design prioritizes functionality over nuanced ergonomics.
-
Smith & Wesson M&P 2.0: The M&P 2.0 boasts a more ergonomic grip, with a more rounded design and interchangeable backstraps. This allows for customization to fit a wider range of hand sizes and preferences. The texturing is less aggressive than the Glock, offering a balance of grip and comfort. The slightly more substantial grip can aid in recoil management for some shooters.
| Feature | Glock 19 | Smith & Wesson M&P 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Grip Texture | Aggressive | Moderate |
| Grip Angle | More aggressive | More ergonomic |
| Interchangeable Backstraps | No | Yes |
| Overall Feel | Functional, less refined | Comfortable, customizable |
Trigger
-
Glock 19: The Glock 19's trigger is known for its long, somewhat stiff pull. While reliable, it lacks the crispness and tactile feedback preferred by some shooters. The trigger safety is incorporated into the trigger itself.
-
Smith & Wesson M&P 2.0: The M&P 2.0's trigger is generally considered to be smoother and lighter than the Glock's, with a more defined reset. It provides a more predictable and comfortable shooting experience for many users. The trigger safety is also an integral part of the trigger mechanism.
Sights
Both pistols typically come equipped with standard three-dot sights, although aftermarket sight options are readily available for both. The choice of sights comes down to personal preference.
Accuracy and Reliability
Both the Glock 19 and the Smith & Wesson M&P 2.0 are renowned for their reliability and accuracy. Extensive testing has shown both to function flawlessly under a wide range of conditions. Accuracy differences are largely dependent on the shooter's skill and technique, rather than inherent differences in the pistols.
Capacity
Standard magazine capacity is 15 rounds for both the Glock 19 and the M&P 2.0, although extended magazines are available for both.
Cost
Pricing can vary depending on retailer and specific features, but the Glock 19 is generally slightly less expensive than the Smith & Wesson M&P 2.0.
Which Pistol is Right for You?
The "best" pistol depends entirely on individual needs and preferences.
Choose the Glock 19 if:
- You prioritize a simple, rugged, and reliable pistol with a proven track record.
- You prefer a more aggressive grip texture and a straightforward design.
- You are on a tighter budget.
Choose the Smith & Wesson M&P 2.0 if:
- You value a more comfortable and ergonomic grip.
- You prefer a smoother, lighter trigger pull.
- You want the ability to customize the grip with interchangeable backstraps.
Ultimately, the best way to determine which pistol is right for you is to rent or borrow both models and test them at a shooting range. This allows you to personally experience the ergonomics, trigger pull, and overall feel of each pistol before making a significant purchase. Consider the factors discussed above, and remember that firearm ownership comes with significant responsibilities. Proper training and safe handling practices are crucial.